WE HAVE TRIED DIPLOMACY - IF THIS FAILS, WE MUST TAKE ACTION WE HAVE A PLAN - BUT IT MUST REMAIN SECRET UNTIL THE RELEVANT TIMEĪLL THOSE THAT ARE TRUE SUPPORTERS OF A CHAT FREE FROM TYRANNY PLEASE SEND ME A DM AND I WILL TELL YOU HOW YOU CAN HELP THE CAUSE IF ACTION IS NECESSARY IN LESS THAN 72 HOURS WE MUST TAKE ACTION IF THE CURRENT OWNER, JIDRIL, DOES NOT COMPLY WITH OUR JUST REQUESTS Its okay if you didn't find them enjoyable, but to say that they were bad is just wrong.ĪTTENTION ALL THOSE THAT BELIEVE IN QUALITY CHAT AND THE SHUTDOWN OF OPPRESSION I don't know if you are referring to Squares (the show that was cancelled in favor of the NLSS) or the old The Roundtable Podcast, but both of those were really good shows that only people with **** taste would call bad. The worst part though, is that they will often go out of their way to make fun of their critics, and then say that the critics are right and the old NLSS was miles better (which it was) and then go right back to making fun of the critics for being right. The show is garbage that treats its audience with contempt, and act as if they are barely sentient, and the writing is the laziest that it can possibly get away with. Im like Northernlion up in this **** welcome to NLSS **** the grand total of zane within your mind right now is through the roof im like a bio major on steroids i am the alpha and the omega of **** Twitch will have to devote three entire hours of broadcasting in order to get any of this across to the general public the masses will become scared of my power im a wanted man the president wants my **** on a silver platter but since im the master of zane i can just go full **** lionDemon in a trench coat on this **** im a master of impressions half the time i dont even recognize my own voice not out of stupidity like you im just that good at isaac im like a pot play right about now im one zany son of a **** I am not sure what logic I have not yet responded to, or what evidence is somehow refuting my position. You are reciting definitions and name dropping fallacies and things like gate keeping, but you are not actively engaging with the things being said. I think your inclination towards getting defensive is clouding your ability to read what people are saying in good faith. It's late Friday here, and I'm getting a little drunk, so I'll be honest. I have only discussed the problems of making a field easily digestible, and then regurgitating that easily digestible material. I don't have any problems with your "argument", which is why I haven't brought it up. I talked generally on the subject of non experts talking about expert subjects, and how that generally goes, and why people might have a problem with that, me being one of those people. I'm pretty sure I've repeatedly said that you didn't say anything that was explicitly wrong, and that if you did, I wouldn't have the tools to know. I have not made any evaluative claims about your knowledge. I think we're getting at the source of the issues here. Anger can be good, if it does not cloud your thinking too much. I just want to preface this with that I do not care if you respond in anger.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |